Canon DSLR Camera [EOS 90D] with Built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, DIGIC 8 Image Processor
Original price was: $1,199.00.$999.00Current price is: $999.00.
Last updated on November 8, 2024 9:45 am Details
- High image quality with 32.5 Megapixel CMOS (APS-C) sensor
- High-speed continuous shooting of up to 10 fps with no time Lag during ovf shooting
- 4K UHD 30P/ Full HD 120P video
- 45-Point All Cross-type AF System supports up to 27 points with an F/8 metering
- Use the EOS Utility Webcam Beta Software (Mac and Windows) to turn your Canon camera into a high-quality webcam, or do the same using a clean HDMI output.
Shipping & Delivery Information
We commit to providing you with the best shopping experience through Amazon. The shipping policy includes detailed information below:
Shipping Costs: Amazon's policy will calculate shipping costs. You can check the specific shipping fees for each product on the product page.
Delivery Time: The delivery time is usually 3 to 7 business days, depending on your location. When you place your order, the system will display specific delivery time information.
Delivery Areas: Amazon provides shipping services to many different areas. Please refer to the information on the product page to see if the delivery can reach your address.
Return Policy: If you are not satisfied, please see Amazon's return policy. You can find detailed information on Amazon's site.
For more about the shipping policy, visit Amazon's Shipping Policy.
10 reviews for Canon DSLR Camera [EOS 90D] with Built-in Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, DIGIC 8 Image Processor
Add a review
Related products
J. S. –
I have only owned Canon cameras but have shot with a couple of other brands and Canon in my opinion is the best. I decided to get the EOS 90D as the capabilities for the price are a real bargain. Love it.
J. S. –
This might be the camera I have been waiting from Canon for some time now, however the verdict is still out.
INTRODUCTION
I have been into amateur photography since the film days and once I got into digital photography I was a Canon shooter until 2017 when I discovered Pentax K-1.
I have also used mirrorless like Olympus E-M10 Mark II, Panasonic Lumix G9, Fuji X-T100 and Canon M50.
Since I started shooting with Pentax I pretty much abandoned all my Canon gear, including 5D Mark II, however I kept using Canon 70D mainly for air shows, nature and lately for birding as well as movie shooting.
I got more into birding lately and I was looking for a good alternative to a DSLR for this purpose. Tried Panasonic G9 with 100-400mm lens but it was not a match to Canon 70D and Sigma 150-600mm Contemporary. I really got a great copy that is tack sharp wide open at 600mm. This lens alone and 100-400L trombone was what was keeping me from dumping Canon for good.
Since I have been looking for something to upgrade my 70D for birding and air shows, I will be reviewing this camera mostly from this point of view.
FIRST IMPRESSIONS
The build is very similar to 70D. The major difference I noticed the most is the grip, which is protruding more and it is more comfortable to hold the camera with a big zoom lens.
For people with smaller hands it might be somewhat of an adjustment but it fits me just right. Other than the grip, the joystick and few buttons placed slightly differently, it feels really like the same camera.
The menus changed slightly but it took me no time to set it up pretty much same way I had 70D set up.
SHOOTING PERFORMANCE
I just received it today (9/12/2019) and went outside to shoot some comparison hand held shots with my Sigma 150-600mm.
Since it was late the light was getting more and more challenging. Stationary subject for now and auto ISO max 3,200 on both 90D and 70D with 6.3 aperture.
First thing I noticed was a difference in the shutter sound and I must say I like it much more than the one of 70D. It is more subtle yet sounds pretty assuring. I know this is more intangible quality but I like it. Never paid too much attention to this until 90D.
The second thing that stood out was that 90D was suggesting slightly different shutter speed at the same auto ISO and aperture. 90D would also sometimes pick slightly different auto ISO as well. In general the numbers looked like 90D is slightly more sensitive than 70D.
Have not had a chance to test tracking yet but I tried burst RAW only shooting and with Lexar Professional 1667x 128GB SDXC UHS-II at the maximum 10 frames per second rate the buffer filled up in 3 seconds. At 3 frames per second rate (slow burst mode) the buffer filled up after 19 seconds. After that it became very random, from 1 per second to 4 per second frame rate.
In more realistic bird shooting simulation when I usually shoot 4-7 frames and take a second or so of brake between bursts, it took almost a minute or so for the buffer to start slowing the shooting down.
OCTOBER 2019 UPDATE:
Went out birding several times and in real time shooting situation I think the buffer only slowed me down once over several days. This is really good considering this thing does 10fps. So far so good.
I also tried some BIF of hawks and eagles flying around and I must say that the viewfinder performance in tracking mode seems much better than 70D. This all with my Sigma 150-600MM C.
Soon the air show will come to town and I will give 90D run through with my Canon trombone 100-400L.
AIRSHOW UPDATE:
Went to airshow with Canon 100-400L trombone and results are what I was waiting for.
Previously I shot airshows mainly with my Canon 5D Mark II as somehow the quality was better than 70D.
Now I can leave 5D behind and just use 90D from now on.
Autofocus performance in AFC mode was spot on and out of thousands of photos maybe few were not completely up to snuff.
I also attached some samples from the shoot.
PICTURE QUALITY
With the limited time I had to test so far I must say that the sharpness is there and the extra pixels make quite a difference. I did some comparison shots between 70D and 90D and must say that at the same zoom there is much more sharpness to photos.
Colors seem identical so far. I usually use DxO to process photos but 90D profile is not yet available for DxO yet so I only used Canon’s DPP.
The noise level at 3,200 ISO seems more pleasing on 90D than 70D.
I was looking for something with more resolution to shoot birds in case I need to crop.
My full frame Pentax has pixels but there is no lens that could compete with the reach of Sigma 150-600mm on the crop sensor.
I will post updates as I do more testing. Over next couple of weeks I will be doing more testing of actual birds and maybe some challenging birds in flight. I will also try some 4k videos.
I will also try testing some macro photography, including macro focus stacking as 90D has the macro bracketing function built in (although only in Live View shooting mode).
OCTOBER 2019 UPDATE:
Went out birding several times and the resolution bump makes a big difference. Much less cropping penalty, gets me closer to those smaller birds.
Picture quality very good and in focus hit ratio very good also.
I took my old 70D to do some comparisons with but I failed at that because as soon as I started to shoot birds with 90D I never put it away. It was that much of a difference.
Photos attached to this review are only processed with Canon DPP.
CONCLUSIONS
It is too early to tell just yet but this seems to be shaping up to be what I was looking for birding, nature and macro photography.
It may also become my travel camera as well since it is not very heavy and with two EF-S lenses it does not take that much space in the backpack.
OCTOBER 2019 UPDATE:
As of now only Canon DPP recognizes RAW images (had to be upgraded) but I suppose this will change soon enough.
This is okay for now but I hope DxO Photo Lab will add it to their camera lineup soon.
Still happy with the camera. Big upgrade from 70D for birding.
LATEST UPDATE:
DxO has the profiles now and they work great.
Battery life is improved with the slightly more capacity of new LP-E6N.
Old LP-E6 batteries also work just fine and the number of photos on one battery charge depends on how you shoot.
For example, at the air show I shot almost 3.5k photos, most in bursts at 10fps and the new battery lasted me for all of them.
You need to carry spare, because you will forget there is even battery there and eventually you will run out, usually when least expected ;-).
The multi controller (aka joystick) is very useful and welcomed addition.
Low light performance is improved over 70D but not by much.
However, considering that this is 32.5 megapixel APS-C it is not very surprising. In Canon world it is an equivalent of 86 megapixel full frame, which by the way does not exist. Therefore, expecting low light performance of full frame cameras would be like expecting technological miracle.
For low light birding I use Pentax KP crop camera but that one is 24 megapixels.
Cropping is double edged sword. If the subject is close enough but small, then cropping helps a lot and produces amazing results. However, when subject is pretty far away, cropping might be detrimental to the photo quality due to atmospheric conditions but that is just physics.
Just wanted to mention this so no one expects miracles.
Still keeping the camera, even after briefly considering putting pre-order on Canon R5.
However, for birding and air shows with the current lenses available (at reasonable prices) full frame will not work for me as well as 90D does.
Isamar Ramírez –
It’s the perfect upgrade from my T4i.
Marcia Sistek –
The 90D works similar to the 70D it is replacing. Functions are faster, the screen is fabulous and controls are in similar locations. Photos taken in CR3 format are around 32 to 35 MB each. The Canon Digital Photo Professional MUST be version 4.10.50.1 in order to open the CR3 files. Photos saved from my 70d as CR2 files, when saved to JPG post editing, took 10 or so seconds to covert and save. It takes 30 seconds for the same action with the CR3 file. EACH FILE. That excess time is going to be an issue as I take high school football photos and if I have to post/convert/save 300+ shots each game…. well, time is time.
I will experiment with just JPG shooting this week… but really like being able to adjust the photos as a RAW.
Oh yes, the photos… day shots are fabulous. rapid and accurate focus. Face and eye detection work well. Night shots are coming this weekend..
Night football photos at the high school is better than the 70D, but I am VERY disappointed with the focusing. It is slow and inaccurate. I have used both of the “spot focus” points and find no difference in accuracy. My 70D was better at proper focus than the 90D is. I use a Canon 70-200 f2.8 lens. The photos that do focus correctly are better than the 70D. BUT, focus ability compared to the 70D is POOR.
Matthew –
As described
Yetimonster –
Es una muy buena camara Reflex, uso mucho el formato APS-C por la magnificacion, compre adicional a mis lentes un lente de motor nano y estabilizador de imagen, de alta apertura, (1.8) por lo que las imágenes son brillantes y de extraordinaria calidad sin tener que gastar mas de cuatro veces en una R5, no tendrá todo pero tiene mas de lo que yo necesito
Someone –
Ya tenía tiempo viendo la Canon 90D y decidí comprarla, la verdad no me ha decepcionado. Adquirí únicamente el cuerpo y lo complementé con un lente Sigma 18-35mm 1.8
Paul E. Nistico –
I use my DSLRs almost exclusively for nature photography (mostly bird photography) with a 300mm Canon IS f/4 lens attached. In purchasing the 90D, I was stepping up from a Canon 70D (20MP) for the extra sharpness and the ability to crop without as much loss of resolution. I got what I was seeking, but not before undergoing some transitional issues. It never occurred to me that my first DSLR – a Canon 20D (8 MP) – and my new Canon 90D (32MP) , had the same size sensor. That means that the 90D’s pixels are packed tighter and are SMALLER. Is there a downside to those smaller pixels? According to some experts — yes. There is greater difficulty in getting a sharp image with smaller pixels. In fact, my early efforts with the 90D were somewhat disappointing. I had always shot using the “P” setting – I set the ISO, and the camera set the shutter speed and aperture. I’ve found that the key to sharp shots with the 90D and a big, heavy telephoto (which is often handheld) is HIGH SHUTTER SPEED. You’ll find videos on the WEB about this, but I have now switched to using the “M” setting. I set the shutter speed (if sufficient light I try for at least 1/2000) and the f/stop (preferably f8, but may settle for as low as f5 if light is a problem), and then set the ISO to “A” (automatic). Thus, I control shutter speed and aperture but let the camera pick the ISO. In low light, I have to compromise my variables, but even so the ISO may go to as high as 6400 in really low light. That’s not good, but if I insisted on a lower ISO setting, I might have missed the image entirely (gotten a blurred image from long shutter speed). It’s been a change of philosophy, but using that system, the 90D has been giving me great images of incredible sharpness. If you do regular short lens photography you won’t have some of these problems. Either way, it’s a great body, but be aware of the “small pixel” issue when hand holding the camera and lens.
Wella Novee –
Omg the quality of this camera is Everything! The design makes it’s really comfortable to hold even for long periods of time. Simple and easy to use. Worth every penny!
Highly Recommend!
enrique –
Originally had a T6 that I started out with a couple years ago. Thought it was finally time to upgrade. The camera is awesome. The images are crisp (compared to a t6). It’s bulkier and the features are a lot of fun to play with. The package also arrived a few days before the expected due date so I had the weekend to play with it. The only weird thing is that I bought the body only but it arrived in the box that would have included the lens. So that means the box was opened and separated. Everything else looked sealed tho and I’m overall very happy with my purchase.